Novel oral anticoagulants and the 73rd anniversary of historical warfarin.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The last 70 years of Warfarin use has been associated with extreme problems. The Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) are not well utilized in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF). We thought to excavate the clinical utility of NOACs and provide some insights into their usefulness as suitable alternatives to Warfarin. Methods: The main objective is to raise awareness of clinicians regarding the underutilized NOACs and shed light on concerns surrounding their utility as suitable alternatives to Warfarin. We searched the literature for recent meta-analysis about NOACs. Results: The choice between the four NOACs depends largely on the cost and patient’s preferences rather on their safety profile. They were better when compared with Warfarin, nevertheless; no head-to-head comparison was performed between NOACs members. The selection of one NOAC over the others rely on patients characteristics (age), cost, insurance coverage, dosing interval (once versus twice) and renal status. One more obstacle to utilization of NOACs is the reversal of bleeding. Discussion: There are three integrated grey areas for suitability to NOAC required to be discussed and argued in light of all of the trials, meta-analysis and pharmaceutical-race. The first is relevant to patient in term of demographics (e.g. age), co-morbidities (e.g. chronic kidney disease), degree of renal impairment (creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min), adherence to daily dosing and risk of bleeding. Most patients with AF are having comorbidities with problematic poly-pharmacy issues. The second is implications of cost and insurance coverage on NOAC selection which is considered highly significant for clinicians. The third is relevant to each NOAC pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profile as dosing interval. Conclusion: The messages taken from this overview is to encourage utility of NOACs in daily clinical practice, evaluate the patient preferences, consider cost and insurance coverage and select a NOAC over Warfarin when the overall clinical judgment is optimal.
منابع مشابه
An Overview of Novel Anticoagulants
Arterial and venous thromboembolism is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. For almost seventy years, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. However, many of the limitations of these traditional anticoagulants have led to the search for and attempts to introduce better drug ...
متن کاملComparison of Dabigatran vs. Warfarin in Acute Vnous Thromboemboly: Systematic Review
abstract:Acute Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease associated with the significant morbidity and mortality. We reviewed clinical outcomes systematically with Dabigatran as a direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for treatment of acute VTE. We used Ovide, PubMed, Cochrane (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Scopus, Science Direct, LILAC(for article written not English) and also Iranian database; Magiran...
متن کاملComparison of Dabigatran vs. Warfarin in Acute Vnous Thromboemboly: Systematic Review
abstract:Acute Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease associated with the significant morbidity and mortality. We reviewed clinical outcomes systematically with Dabigatran as a direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for treatment of acute VTE. We used Ovide, PubMed, Cochrane (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Scopus, Science Direct, LILAC(for article written not English) and also Iranian database; Magiran...
متن کاملA cost comparison of warfarin vs enoxaparine or new oral anticoagulants used for the treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism.
Introduction Recently, novel oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban) have been approved for pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment. Each anticoagulant used during initial and maintenance therapy has direct and indirect costs for healthcare systems. Demonstrating the costs of treatment with different anticoagulants in a specific patient group will be helpful for clinicians determining...
متن کاملPossible failure of novel direct-acting oral anticoagulants in management of pulmonary embolism: a case report
BACKGROUND The relative effectiveness of vitamin K antagonists compared with novel oral anticoagulants in treating pulmonary embolism remains unclear. Recent trials comparing the efficacy of vitamin K antagonists with factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary emboli have been non-inferiority studies based primarily on risk reduction (such as bleeding events), rather than resolution of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
دوره 28 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016